本文へ
MMadical AI Use

Source record

External validation of a widely deployed sepsis model

論文論文

この言語の本文は未訳のため、英語で表示しています。

The source is Wong and colleagues, JAMA Internal Medicine, 21 June 2021, an external validation of the Epic Sepsis Model at Michigan Medicine. Across 38,455 hospitalizations the hospitalization-level AUC was 0.63 (95% CI 0.62–0.64). At a score of 6 or higher the model alerted on 18% of hospitalizations, did not identify 67% of sepsis cases, and found only 7% of sepsis patients who had not already received timely antibiotics. The paper is a caution about local validation of a widely deployed proprietary score.

Source date
2021年6月21日 · 年 2021
Evidence label
論文
Source type
論文

Citation

Wong et al., JAMA Internal Medicine

Wong et al. External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients. JAMA Internal Medicine, 21 June 2021. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2781307

Key public facts

  • The study covers 38,455 adult hospitalizations at Michigan Medicine. The score was recalculated through the stay.
  • Sepsis was defined from surveillance criteria and the record, not from the model’s own label.
  • The hospitalization-level AUC was 0.63 (95% CI 0.62–0.64), below the discrimination the developer had reported.
  • At a score of 6 or higher the model alerted on 18% of hospitalizations and did not identify 67% of sepsis cases.
  • It found only 7% of sepsis patients who had not already received timely antibiotics.
Original link

Opens the publisher page in a new tab.

Back to the case

教育と市場把握のための条目。医療助言でも推奨でもありません。

スポンサー

このインデックスの臨床読者に届ける。

スポンサー枠を見る